Stand Up For Seaton
Ms Kate Little
Planning Department
Council Offices, Knowle
Sidmouth EX10 8HL
2 February 2006
Dear Ms Little
Liatris Planning Application – 06/3400/MOUT – Seaton Regeneration
Area
Stand Up For Seaton – Supplementary Planning Objections 01 and 02
Further to the detailed objections to the above planning application
contained in our letter of 25 January 2007 we wish to add two further
objections based on recent health research.
It has been stated in the above planning application that raising the
floodplain by approximately 2 metres will involve 65-90 lorries per day,
10 hours per day, 6 days per week for 3-4 years to bring in one million
tons of infill and to this must be added a further 3-4 years of heavy
construction traffic. We therefore make the following two supplementary
planning objections as regard Local Plan Policy EN21 – Control of
Pollution:
Supplementary objection 1: Pollution – Children exposed to traffic
fumes from the development will be at risk of health problems throughout
their lives if this development is allowed to go ahead (Policy EN21 –
control of pollution)
In research published in "The Lancet" on 26 January 2007, it states
that ears of the harmful effects of traffic emissions are raised today
in a major study linking motorway pollution with permanent and
life-limiting damage to children's lungs. People who live within 500
metres of a pollutants grow up with significantly reduced lung capacity,
and even children who have never experienced asthma are at risk,
scientists warn.
The effect on Seaton of the level of traffic cited by the developer
will have the effect of creating conditions similar to those in the
study within the town. The study goes on to say that this is the first
to link permanent lung damage, which can shorten life expectancy, to
traffic pollution. Previous research by the same scientists showed that
children who grew up in areas of high pollution and car fumes were more
likely to develop asthma. But the new study provides strong evidence
that vehicle emissions stunt crucial lung development in children
between the ages of 10 and 18. The researchers suggest that diesel fumes
are to blame.
They studied 3,677 children in 12 areas of southern California where
a wide range of air qualities was recorded. They measured their lung
capacity according to three measures annually between the ages of 10 and
18. They also took air quality readings in each area, recorded the
distance the children lived from a motorway or major road and created a
model that took into account local traffic statistics to measure their
exposure to traffic.
Should this development be allowed, it will produce a detrimental
effect on all children within 500m of the route of lorries to be used –
bearing in mind that one route takes them directly past the primary
school, doctors surgeries, several nursing homes and close to Seaton
Hospital.
Supplementary Objection 2: Pollution - Women exposed to
traffic fumes from the development will be at greater risk of heart
disease if this development is allowed to go ahead (Policy EN21 –
control of pollution)
One of the largest studies of its kind has found that women breathing
polluted air were at increased risk of heart attacks and strokes. The
study involved almost 66,000 women aged between 50 and 79 who were
monitored for nine years as part of the Women's Health Initiative, a
major US investigation into the causes of heart disease in women. The
results, in The New England Journal of Medicine, suggest that - for
older women at least - fine particulates are far more hazardous than was
thought. Pollution was assessed by the average number of particulates,
which ranged from four to almost 20 micrograms per cubic metre of air.
The effect of allowing this development will be to put women in Seaton
in a similar situation to those documented.
A previous investigation by the American Cancer Study found a 12 per
cent increased risk of cardiovascular heart disease with each 10
microgram rise. That study was conducted among men and women across a
range of ages.
Professor Jeremy Pearson, associate medical director of the British
Heart Foundation, said: "This robust new research follows other
large-scale studies which have linked long-term exposure to air
pollution to an increased risk of death from heart disease and stroke,
and suggests the increased risk is greater than we previously thought.
This adds to the mounting evidence that air pollution should be taken
seriously as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease."
Should this development be allowed, it will produce a detrimental
effect women in Seaton – particularly bearing in mind that both routes
pass doctors surgeries, a school, several nursing homes and close to
Seaton Hospital.
A copy of this letter has been sent to the two Seaton medical
practices.
Yours faithfully
Cc: Townsend Road Medical Practice
Seaton and Colyford Medical Practice